Based on Dish Network adding a commercial auto-skip feature (and the subsequent complaints) and my previous speculations, I thought it’d be interesting to discuss what TV might look like if (when) advertisers stop advertising for everything but live events like sports and news.
Here’s what’s true:
- There’s more TV shows than ever
- There’s more good TV shows than ever (and still plenty of bad ones)
- Because of the segmented market (a.k.a. more and more cable networks), a show can have a lower rating and still stay on the air
- A TV show can get (more) popular five years after it goes off the air due to DVD sales and the internet (The Wire, Arrested Development, etc.)
- If it’s easy and reliable, consumers will pay some amount of money per month ($10 for Netflix/Hulu Plus to $100+ for a cable/satellite provider ) to watch TV shows on their TV and or other devices
- People don’t want to watch TV commercials (or at least wouldn’t complain if they disappeared)
- The TV Network financial model is all about selling commercials
- For live broadcasts, TV quality is still significantly better and more reliable than the internet
Imagine all advertising stops for non-live shows (everything but the news and sports). How else might TV shows make money?
Here’s my idea: Have each user pay $X a month for unlimited video, then pay each show a percentage, based on how much of it the user watches.
A cable box-like device would measure how many M minutes you watch of each show and add up how much TV you watch each month.
That show’s income could = M (minutes of show watched) / T (Total Minutes of TV this month) * $X (the monthly service fee)
In other words, each show gets the % of your monthly viewing fee which you spent watching that show.
Example: The service costs $40 per month, I watch 5 episodes of The Office with each episode being 20 minutes long, and I watch 800 total minutes of TV in the month. The creators of The Office would receive (20 * 5) / 800 * 40 (1/8 of 40) which is $5. With 9 million viewers, these numbers add up quickly. Of course, the company (most likely cable, satelite or dot com) that creates and adminsters such a system would charge an administrative fee (I’d imagine it around 10% – 20%).
Some Consequences / Impacts:
- The more popular your show, the more money it makes.
- It’d be more profitable to get users who barely watch TV to watch your show.
- Built in residual income — if your show gets popular five years after it comes off the air, you still get paid the same amount and can turn a profit. This is basically The Long Tail effect.
- Contracts structure might be changed so that more actors / directors / writers are paid a percentage of the total income, instead of a one time fee. This better aligns everyone’s incentives for a successful, long running, well written series.
- Instead of pitching an idea to a TV Network or production company, you could pitch it directly to a venture capitalist (Sillicon Valley Style) or Satellite/Cable/Amazon/Netflix type company. This may lead to more buyers and consequently more shows.
- This same cable-like box could also incorporate an Amazon / NetFlix like recommendation system for TV. Users can rate and review shows, and receive recommendations on what shows they may like based on how they’ve rated shows to date.
- This could turn into a Pandora type stream, where everyone has their own customized channel(s) with the shows they like to watch. Would networks still be necessary?
- Everything but news and sports can become on demand, and there’s no waiting week to week for the next episode of the season.
Clayton Fletcher is a national headliner who performs all over the USA in various clubs and colleges. He has been seen on MTV, Sex & the City, and Rikki Lake. His live comedy show, The Clayton Fletcher Show, takes place every Friday and Saturday at 8PM at New York Comedy Club. For more, visit
These are the lessons I’ve learned along the way, and while you can probably apply this to other aspects of your life, it’s especially true in Corporate America.